
Not surprisingly, at least not to anyone living in my household, a recent NY Times blurb cited a study that men are more likely than women to be strongly attached to their online connections. One of the conclusions drawn is that women seem to value their real-world relationships more than their online ones. Could be quite a leap to infer that boys may feel the same way, but it’s food for thought. There are no girl-children in this household, but the two boys certainly would prefer to live in their online world rather than actually have to carry on even the most mundane of conversations face-to-face. Is this just the result of adolescence, rather than a trait attributable to gender differences?
Not sure if this upholds the study’s findings or contradicts them, but the boys’ online relationships seem to be just as underdeveloped as their real-life ones. An e-mail trail of a 13-year old in my household reads something like:
teen 1: u there? teen 2: huh teen 1: whassup? teen 2: dunno, bored teen 1: zzzzzz teen 2: yup teen 1: zzzzzzssssssszzzzzzzzsssssssss . . . and so on.
This type of exchange can go back and forth at least 30 times before some YouTube video draws one of the participant’s attention away.
We may observe similarites and differences among kids’ online and offline relationships, and attempt to draw some conclusions, but the cited study measured how the participants feel about their relationships. While this was by no means an exhaustive and detailed research project, it provides a springboard for ideas.
Here’s the link to the NYT blurb:
For Men, Stronger Online Connections
Here’s the original report from the Annenberg Center for the Digital Future at USC:
cdf-sexes-diverge